Name: The Grand Argument (Part III) (The Text Against Its Myth)
SKU: 196928324
Price: 42790 KRW
Availability: InStock
Author: Samir Alghool
ISBN: 9798985781991

카트

이미지 검색을 사용해 보세요

검색창 이전화면 이전화면

최근 검색어: 전체삭제

인기 검색어

닫기

The Grand Argument (Part III) (The Text Against Its Myth)

사이즈비교 공유하기

소득공제 수입

직수입양서 The Grand Argument (Part III) (The Text Against Its Myth)

When Language Breaks Free from History and Ritual) Perfect,eng, POD 주문제작도서

바인딩/에디션 안내

Samir Alghool

Vibes28Publisher 2026.09.20.

회원리뷰 첫번째 리뷰어가 되어주세요

직수입외서는 변심/착오로 인해 주문을 취소할 경우 해외주문 취소수수료 20%가 부과됩니다.?

가격: 42,790원

42,790

YES포인트?: 1,290원 (3%) 마니아추가적립

5만원 이상 구매 시 2천원 추가 적립

앱 다운 시 1천원 상품권

결제혜택: 최대 6만원 캐시백

주문 제작 (POD) 도서로 제본 및 인쇄 품질이 다소 미흡할 수 있습니다 (해당 사유 반품 불가)

이미 소장하고 있다면 판매해 보세요.

예스24에 팔기 바이백 신청 불가 내 가게에서 팔기

국내배송만 가능
해외 거래처 사정에 의하여 품절/지연 가능
도서 정보 중 미표기 사항 안내?
문화비소득공제 가능

시리즈 태그 업체 공지사항 중고직수입양서 소개 구성 소개 특별 구성 MD 한마디 카드뉴스 상세 이미지 책소개 관련 동영상 목차 저자 소개 관련분류 품목정보 만든이 코멘트 예스24 리뷰 책 속으로 줄거리 캐스팅 관련 자료 부가 영상 출판사 리뷰 전문가 리뷰 추천평

펼치기/닫기

책소개

<h1>The Grand Argument - Part Three</h1><h3>The Text Against Its Myth: When Language Breaks Free from History and Ritual</h3>What happens when we take a text that has accumulated centuries of interpretation, tradition, and ritual, and examine it from within-apart from the images shaped by memory and history?After Part One uncovered the structure from which meaning begins, and Part Two moved from the letter to the name and the ideas it carries about God, humanity, consciousness, and evil, Part Three takes the most ambitious step: applying the method to the text itself, especially where language has become deeply entangled with history and inherited tradition.The question is no longer about a single letter or name.It becomes:What does the text say when we read its language before we read its history?The investigation begins by examining the relationship between Isra' and Israel, and exploring whether movement and migration might extend beyond a particular historical narrative into a broader principle governing human communities, their development, and coexistence.But the most radical shift comes with Hajj-the pilgrimage.Here, the method confronts one of the most established readings in religious history. Was Hajj, in its original linguistic structure, simply a description of a ritual practice-or does analysis of the word itself lead toward argument, proof, reasoning, and the establishment of evidence?The question is whether the language itself supports the meaning that history has given the word.The book then turns to its own method. Can the framework developed throughout this investigation constitute a system capable of measurement, replication, prediction, and falsification-or is it simply a coherent interpretive construction?The method is examined through independence, prediction, reproducibility, internal consistency, and compatibility with modern scientific knowledge, while being placed in critical dialogue with linguistics, philosophy, and cognitive linguistics.No conclusion is imposed in advance. If a hypothesis withstands testing, it remains open to further development; if it does not, it must be reconsidered. The value of the method lies not in protecting a predetermined conclusion, but in creating a framework in which conclusions can be challenged.And here, the circle closes.The book is not simply trying to replace an old interpretation with a new one. It searches for the distance between the text and what has been built around it-between language and history, meaning and memory, and what a word actually says and what human beings have come to see in it.If Part One opened the door of the letter, and Part Two crossed the threshold of the name, Part Three enters the text as a whole-and ultimately turns back to question the very instrument through which the text has been read.At its conclusion, The Grand Argument does not offer a closed certainty. It returns the question to the reader:What if the myth we have built around the text has been hiding what the text itself is saying?If Part One asked:How does language work?And Part Two asked:What has language done to humanity by naming the things it could not explain?Then Part Three asks the final question:<h1>What remains of the text when language is placed against history, and meaning against myth?</h1><h1></h1>

책소개 더보기펼치기