Introduction Section A: Case Studies: Germany, Argentina, Chile
1. Settling Accounts for Nazi-era Judicial Injustice (NS-Justizunrecht) Before Allied and (West-) German Courts: Charting New Territories and Failed Opportunities
2. Malfeasance in Office as a Crime in the Context of Dictatorships: The Example of Judicial Perversion of Justice in the East German Waldheim Trials
3. Prosecuting State Criminality After German Unification – Judging the Judges
4. Dictatorship and Judicial Complicity: The Case of Argentina
5. Judicial Murder in Chile: Patterns, Cases, and Doctrines for Prosecuting Jurists
6. Self-Representations of the Chilean Judiciary Regarding their Responsibility in Relation to the Crimes of the Dictatorship Section B. Judicial Immunity and the Invalidation of Judicial Decisions
7. Judicial Immunity and its Limits: The Anglo-American Approach
8. Judicial Immunity: A South American Approach
9. Invalidation of ‘Judicial’ Decisions in Cases of Sham or Show Trials: An International Criminal Law Perspective
11. Fraudulent Res Judicata and Impunity: A Chilean Perspective Section C | Intent, Mistake of Law and Other Issues of Imputation
12. Judicial Abuse and Mistake of Law: A Normative Approach Based on a Comparative Law Perspective
13. Defending the Indefensible: The Mistake of Law Defence Applied to the Case of Judges in Dictatorships and Rogue Regimes - A Comparative Approach
14. Judicial Murder, Torture, and Unlawful Detention: An Overview from the Italian Legal System
15. On the Relationship Between Judicial Perversion of Justice and Judges' Participation in Crimes Against Humanity Section D | Modes of Responsibility and Criminal Association
16. Superior Responsibility and Judicial Murder: When Judges Are Not “Superior”
17. Jurists’ Responsibility for Crimes of Dictatorships – An International Criminal Law Perspective
18. Judges’ Responsibility for Participation in a Criminal Association: A Comparative and Theoretical Analysis
19. Judges as Criminal Associates of Totalitarian Regimes: The Chilean Case Under the Framework of International Law.
20. A Judge’s Participation in a Criminal or Terrorist Organisation: From Nuremberg to Contemporary German Criminal Law Closing Remarks