“Can AI human’s love be possible?”

By comparing the love between humans and AI humans, I tried to point out the differences and limitations.

If a real doll combined with AI and humanoid robots in a world where made-love and priced-love are prevalent, wouldn’t they look at only one person with pure love and love her/him? The question of what kind of life would it be like was arise. However, I wanted to see and understand that any kind of love has its value, and I wanted to ask for an answer from readers by questioning whether love is possible to learn by gathering injected information.

It was also true that I was worried that I might be humiliated by writing up the novel poorly, as AI appeared in the art field and AI wrote novels and poems already.

Since AI is said to be used everywhere, the worry has been overtaken on me as to whether every man and his dog are trying to use it. Nevertheless, the fact that I wrote this seems to have been pushed back by anxiety that if I don’t write it, I’ll fall behind.

With the advent of AI, you can find and know anything by searching, and you can communicate anywhere in the world in real time with a click. Robots have replaced human resources from serving to technology, and now you have become a translation artist and a musician, writer, and singer without creativity, skills or talent. It is also true that the sour grape of “Let’s have a go" were triggered when even actors, chefs, and politicians were told that they would be replaced by AI.

It’s called an AI real-dol, but can it be active? What if it’s just a mechanical dry reaction without emotion? Or maybe it’s too emotional and active to go beyond the other person?

With the misgivings, I started to come but the concern didn’t stop.

Needless to say, the appearance of AI is due to its convenience. By collecting, combining, mixing, and injecting technology, information, and data, humans have replaced their hands, bodies, and brains to make difficult, and impossible things possible by making them excellent, and highly intelligent. But despite their usefulness and convenience in replacing difficulties, why worry about AI or ChetBot? They worry about being attacked by a lot of their information and brain power.
“Life will be confused and destroyed, it will destroy and attack humans."

No matter how much concern you have, what has already been made of high quality cannot be solved until it is completely destroyed.

I think if you inject proper information to create an AI with the moderate brain power, you may not get what you want very coolly. But I was going to say that it would be better to go a little slower than to embrace the seeds of anxiety. We didn’t feel uncomfortable when we didn’t have it….

They are made of good AI that injects excellent data and information to calculate, derive, and apply them brilliantly, giving humans more help and convenience. But it also is concerned because there is no flexibility or acceptable mind.

-It may be accurate because it is calculated by the combined with data and information inputs, but even if it is not an error or category, there can be no permission or understanding of them, and there can be no reflection, regret, forgiveness, or generosity.

If you hear such a warning itself, it is bound to be a detonator connected to a bomb, with an eerie danger lurking.

However, I decided to think about it a little more. I thought it was necessary to reconsider whether it was AI’s fault to touch the detonator and cause a bomb to explode. If the developer or producer makes it well, I wonder what the problem would be if it was made well so that such a risk did not lurk.

But what’s wrong with not being able to prevent even one little thing?