|
마르셀 프루스트 . The Book of Marcel Proust, by C. K. Scott Moncrief
THE CONTENTS -v- page 1 5 I. Introduction: C.K.S.M. II. A Portrait: STEPHEN HUDSON III. The Prophet of Despair: FRANCIS BIRRELL 12 IV. A Sensitive Petronius: RALPH WRIGHT 31 V. The “Little Proust”: L. PEARSALL SMITH 52 VI. A Reader’s Gratitude: COMPTON MACKENZIE 59 VII. Gilberte: ALEC WAUGH 63 VIII. Proust’s Women: CATHERINE CARSWELL 66 IX. The Best Record: REGINALD TURNER 78 X. A Foot-note: CLIVE BELL 83 XI. The Spell of Proust: ETHEL C. MAYNE 90 XII. A New Psychometry: A.B. WALKLEY 96 XIII. Proust and the Modern Consciousness: J. MIDDLETON MURRY 102 XIV. Proust’s Way: VIOLET HUNT 111 XV. M. Vinteuil’s Sonata: DYNELEY HUSSEY 117 XVI. A Note on the Little Phrase: W.J. TURNER 124 XVII. Proust as Creator: JOSEPH CONRAD 126 XVIII. A Moment to Spare: G. SAINTSBURY 129 XIX. A Real World in Fiction: G.S. STREET 131 XX. The Birth of a Classic: EDGELL RICKWORD 134 XXI. A Casuist in Souls: ARTHUR SYMONS 138 XXII. The Last Word: ARNOLD BENNETT 144 |
|
마르셀 프루스트 . The Book of Marcel Proust, by C. K. Scott Moncrief
I THE death of Marcel Proust in Paris on November 18, 1922, and the manner in which the news of his death was, by no means numerously, reported in London, brought into question the extent of his rumoured rather than defined influence over readers in this country. This question it was natural that I should ask myself, for I had recently published an English version of the first part of his great novel, , and was then about half way through the translation of its sequel, . The writer of a savage, though evidently sincere attack on Proust which a London newspaper published within forty-eight hours of his death seemed to assume that he had already a considerable (if misguided) following here, and it occurred to me that I might obtain, from writers who were my friends, and from others who had expressed their admiration of Proust in English periodicals, a body of critical opinion similar to that which, I learned, was being collected in Paris by the editor of the . To test the worth of my idea, I began with the seniors.-2- Mr. Saintsbury―who (in this respect only) might have served as the model for the Marquis de Norpois, whose promptness in answering a letter “was so astonishing that whenever my father, just after posting one to him, saw his handwriting upon an envelope, his first thought was always one of annoyance that their letters must, unfortunately, have crossed in the post; which, one was led to suppose, bestowed upon him the special and luxurious privilege of extraordinary deliveries and collections at all hours of the day and night”―replied at once, and Mr. Conrad soon followed, with letters of which each correspondent authorised me to make whatever use I chose. |