이미 소장하고 있다면 판매해 보세요.
|
1. 어느 법학교수가 살아온 이야기 ····················· 23
2. 우리 민법학 70년의 성과와 앞으로의 과제 Ⅰ. 序·················································································································· 23 Ⅱ. 民法典 制定 前의 우리 民法學·························································· 25 1. 「無로부터의 출발」·············································································· 25 2. 「飜譯法學」···························································································· 26 3. 「飜案法學」···························································································· 30 Ⅲ. 民法典의 制定과 우리 民法學···························································· 32 1. 民法典 起草에의 關與········································································ 32 2. 『民法案意見書』···················································································· 36 Ⅳ. 民法典의 解釋論的 處理······································································· 40 1. 교과서의저술······················································································ 40 2. 물권행위론: 새로운 규정의 해석문제Ⅰ ······································· 42 3. 소멸시효 완성의 효과: 새로운 규정의 해석문제Ⅱ ··················· 49 4. 전세권: 새로운 규정의 해석문제Ⅲ ··············································· 54 5. 이른바 대물변제의 예약: 새로운 규정의 해석문제Ⅳ ··············· 59 Ⅴ. 民法 制定 후 새로이 제기된 民法問題··········································· 62 1. 부동산임차인의 보호·········································································· 62 2. 소비자의 보호 「약관의 규제에 관한 법률」?「할부거래에 관한 법률」 등······················································································ 66 3. 다양한 事故의 처리············································································ 70 Ⅵ. 우리 民法學의 特殊性 혹은 問題點·················································· 71 1. 교과서 법학···························································································· 71 2. 日本法學의 「克服」?: 「독립한」 민법학 보다「우수한」 민법학을································································································ 76 3. 「현재 있는 법」의 인식으로부터의 출발········································ 86 Ⅶ. 小 結····································································································· 87 3. 김증한 교수의 생애와 학문 점묘 ― 개인적인 시각에서 ― Ⅰ. 들어가기전에·························································································· 91 Ⅱ. 김증한의 삶······························································································· 95 Ⅲ. 김증한의 학문························································································ 102 1. 서양법제사·························································································· 102 2. 전세권과 국가재건최고회의···························································· 107 3. 번역작업······························································································ 111 Ⅳ. 소 결··································································································· 117 4. 이 시대 사법부의 위상과 과제 ― 6년의 경험으로부터 ― Ⅰ. 들어가기 전에························································································ 123 Ⅱ. 우리 국민은 소송을 꺼리는가? ························································ 125 1. 대법원에 접수되는 사건의 엄청난 수·········································· 125 2. 사건 처리의 실제·············································································· 126 3. 우리 국민은 소송을 꺼리는가, 아니면 우리 사회는 ‘소송과잉사회’인가? ·········································································· 127 4. 대법원에서의 사건 폭주에 대하여················································ 132 Ⅲ. 사회의 변화와 법의 대응― 성전환의 경우································ 133 1. 새로운 사회현상과 법?판례························································· 133 2. 성전환에 대한 법적 처리― 주로 강간죄의 대상이라는 관점에서······························································································ 138 Ⅳ. 과거사의 청산························································································ 146 1. 과거사의 청산에 관한 여러 법률들·············································· 146 2. 과거사 관련 민사소송에서의 시효소멸 주장의 신의칙 위반 여부············································································ 148 Ⅴ. 법적 쟁점과 정책 판단······································································· 161 1. 입법적인 해결이라는 것·································································· 161 2. 법치주의에서 입법의 역할······························································ 162 Ⅵ. 맺으면서··································································································· 164 5. 민법학에서 법철학은 무엇인가? ················· 169 ― 개인적 점묘 ― 6. 이자 등 지급의 시기?방법 등에 관한 새로운 약정과 민법 제163조 제 1 호의 단기소멸시효 Ⅰ. 들어가기 전에························································································ 193 Ⅱ. 민법 제63조 제1호의 입법 경과 및 그에 관한 판례의 태도············································································································ 195 1. 입법의경과························································································ 195 2. 판례의태도························································································ 197 Ⅲ. 지급의 시기?방법 등에 대한 새로운 약정과 민법 제63조 제1호········································································································ 202 1. 설 례······························································································ 202 2. 문제의 해결························································································ 204 Ⅳ. 소멸시효제도에 관한 최근의 입법동향과 우리나라에서의 입법작업··································································································· 211 1. 독일과 프랑스···················································································· 211 2. 일 본······························································································ 212 3. 우리나라에서의 입법작업 내용 및 민법 해석에의 시사·········· 214 Ⅴ. 소 결··································································································· 215 7. 민법 제197조 제 2 항의 “본권에 관한 소에서 패소한 때”의 해석에 대하여 Ⅰ. 서················································································································ 217 Ⅱ. 민법 제97조 제2항의 연혁과 입법례 및 규정이유··············· 219 1. 민법 제정과정···················································································· 219 2. 일 본······························································································ 220 3. 프랑스······························································································ 222 4. 독 일······························································································ 223 5. 스위스······························································································ 225 8. 獨自的인 債務不履行類型으로서의 履行拒絶 再論 ― 判例의 形成 및 法律效果를 중심으로 ― Ⅰ. 머리말··································································································· 233 Ⅱ. 履行拒絶에 관한 近來의 裁判例 槪觀··········································· 236 1. 出發點이되는裁判例 ― 대3판1993. 6. 25, 93다1821 ··············· 236 2. 獨自的 債務不履行類型으로서의 履行拒絶에 관한 判例法理의 定立― 대판2005. 8. 19, 2004다3173 ············································ 242 3. 履行拒絶에 관한 近者의 裁判例 ···················································· 246 Ⅲ. 독일의 2002년 債權法 大改正과 履行拒絶··································· 257 1. 들어가기 전에···················································································· 257 2. 2002년 改正에서의 履行拒絶·························································· 258 Ⅳ. 履行拒絶의 法律效果― 塡補賠償請求權을 중심으로··············· 261 1. 序·········································································································· 261 2. 履行拒絶로 인한 塡補賠償額 算定의 基準時······························ 262 3. 塡補賠償請求權에 대한 遲延損害金請求······································ 263 Ⅴ. 글을 맺으면서― 우리 民法學의 어떠한 樣相에 대하여········· 275 9. 한국의 제조물책임법 Ⅰ. 서················································································································ 281 Ⅱ. 製造物責任法理의 展開!― 製造物責任法의 制定에 이르기까지······························································································· 283 1. 裁判例의 發展···················································································· 283 2. 立法化의 움직임················································································ 290 Ⅲ. 製造物責任法의 內容············································································ 291 1. 製造物責任法의 骨格········································································ 291 2. 약간의 附加的 說明·········································································· 294 Ⅳ. 小 結··································································································· 302 10. 은행에 예입 중인 등록금 등에 대한 압류의 허용 여부 Ⅰ. 서················································································································ 307 Ⅱ. 대법원결정의 사실관계와 쟁점························································ 309 Ⅲ. 채권의 강제적 실현과 압류······························································· 310 Ⅳ. 등록금의 학교법인 회계상의 지위와 압류금지························ 314 Ⅴ. 대법원의 종전 재판례들····································································· 316 Ⅵ. 대법원의 태도에 대한 평가와 법적 대응····································· 318 11. [번역] 遺言相續의 初期 歷史 ··················· 323 ― 메인, 고대법(Ancient Law) 제 6 장 12. 토지저당권에 기한 방해배제와 ··············· 365 건물신축의 중지청구 ― 대법원 2006년 1월 27일 판결 2003다58454사건 (판례공보 2006상, 316면) 13. 채무자의 시효이익 포기는 그 후의 ············ 381 저당부동산 제 3 취득자에 대하여도 효력이 미치는가? ― 대법원 2015년 6월 11일 판결 2015다200227사건 (판례공보 2015상, 976면) 14. 자살면책제한조항에 의한 ‘보험사고’의 확장? ·· 391 ― 대법원 2007년 9월 6일 판결 2006다55005사건 (법고을)의 射程範圍 15. 2007년 중요 민사판례 ― 채권편 1. 損害賠償額의 豫定············································································ 399 2. 事情變更의 原則················································································ 400 3. 住宅賃貸借·························································································· 402 4. 公序良俗에 반하는 利子約定에서 임의로 지급된 過剩利子의 返還請求······························································································ 405 5. 第三者의 債權侵害로 인한 不法行爲責任···································· 408 16. 書信으로 쓴 讀後感 ― 非正統的 書評에서조차 벗어나서 Ⅰ. 앞머리에··································································································· 411 Ⅱ. 이상돈, 『법사회학 』(2000) ― 2000년12월7일····························· 414 Ⅲ. 김화진, 『소유와 경영』(2003) ― 2003년9월1일························· 417 Ⅳ. 강정인, 『서구중심주의를 넘어서』(2004) ― 2004년9월5일··· 419 Ⅴ. 이상돈, 『인권법』(2005) ― 2005년9월6일··································· 423 Ⅵ. 조규창, 『比較法(上)(下)』(2006) ― 2006년4월13일··················· 426 Ⅶ. 金相瑢,, 『家族法硏究 Ⅱ』(2006) 및 金疇洙?金相瑢, 『親族?相續法』, 제8판(2006) ― 2006년5월19일····················· 428 Ⅷ. 전원열 역, 『민주주의와 법원의 위헌심사』(2006) ― 2006년12월28일············································································· 431 17. 書信으로 쓴 讀後感?續 Ⅰ. 들어가기 전에························································································ 439 Ⅱ. 박수곤, 「프랑스법에서의 손해배상책임에 대한 개관 ― 채무불이행책임을 중심으로」― 2004년7월23일················ 440 Ⅲ. 김현석 역, 『미국기업파산법』(2005) ― 2005년7월31일····· 442 Ⅳ. 『판사 한기택』(2006) ― 2006년7월26일······································· 445 Ⅴ. 서태영, 『피고인에게 술을 먹여라』(2007) ― 2007년3월3일··· 446 Ⅵ. 심헌섭 역, 『켈젠의 자기증언』(2009) ― 2009년7월2일········· 448 Ⅶ. 서을오, 『물권행위론에 관한 학설사적 연구』(2008) ― 2010년1월3일················································································· 450 Ⅷ. 김창록 역, 『일본국 헌법의 탄생』(2010) ― 2010년8월25일··············································································· 454 Ⅸ. 박지향, “에릭 홉스봄을 기리며” ― 2012년11월1일·············· 457 Ⅹ. 박찬운, 『빈센트 반 고흐, 새벽을 깨우다』(2015) ― 2015년6월15일··············································································· 459 ? 김인섭, 『기적은 끝나지 않았다』(2016) ― 2016년3월6일····· 461 ? 박찬운, 『경계인을 넘어서』(2016) ― 2016년4월13일·············· 466 ⅩⅢ. 김도균 역, 『합법성과 정당성』(2016) ― 2016년6월15일······ 469 ⅩⅣ. 안법영?윤재왕 역, 『법학 방법론』(2016) ― 2016년11월25일············································································ 472 ⅩⅤ. 홍영기, 『법학논문작성법』, 제2판(2016) ― 2016년12월25일············································································ 475 ⅩⅥ. 한동일, 『교회법률용어사전7』 등― 2017년12월8일··············· 478 ⅩⅦ. 한인섭, 『가인김병로』(2018) ― 2018년1월10일····················· 480 ⅩⅧ. Young-Whan Kim, Rechtsphilosophie und Strafrecht in Deutschland und Korea(2017) ― 2018년2월17일··················· 482 ⅩⅨ. 김영환, 『자유주의적 법치국가』(2018) ― 2018년6월10일···· 484 ⅩⅩ. 전광석, 『한국헌법학의 개척자들』(2015) ― 2018년7월8일·· 486 18. [자료] 최근의 일본민법 개정: 계약법 및 소멸시효법 A. 머리말···································································································· 489 1. 최근 일본민법 개정의 외적 경과·················································· 489 2. 일본민법의 제정과 그 후의 개정들·············································· 491 3. 이번 개정의 배경·············································································· 492 4. 이번 개정의 방향과 범위································································ 493 B. 개정의 중요 내용···················································································· 493 Ⅰ. 총 칙 편································································································· 493 1. 법률행위에 관한 규정······································································ 493 2. 소멸시효에 관한 규정······································································ 495 Ⅱ. 채권편 총칙··························································································· 500 1. 채무불이행·························································································· 500 2. 법정이율의 유동화············································································ 503 3. 채권자대위권······················································································ 504 4. 채권자취소권······················································································ 506 5. 보 증······························································································ 509 6. 채권양도······························································································ 516 7. 병존적 채무인수, 면책적 채무인수 및 계약상 지위의 이전에 관한 규정 신설·················································································· 521 8. 유가증권에 관한 규정 신설···························································· 523 Ⅲ. 계약총칙······························································································· 526 1. 계약의 해제························································································ 526 2. 약관 (“定型約款”)에 관한 규정― 제548조의2 이하····················· 527 3. 위험부담···························································································· 529 Ⅳ. 계약각칙······························································································· 530 제1. 계약의 성립― 이른바 발신주의 (제526조 제1항 우리 민법 제531조)의폐지································································ 530 제2. 매 매······························································································· 530 1. 담보책임의 원칙적 폐지― 일반채무불이행의 체계에 흡수···· 530 2. 매매 규정의 다른 개정···································································· 534 제3. 도 급······························································································· 535 1. 수급인의‘담보책임’ ·········································································· 535 2. 그 외의 개정······················································································ 537 제4. 임대차······························································································· 538 1. 존속기간······························································································ 538 2. 임차인의 원상회복의무?수거의무················································· 539 3. 부동산임차인의 방해배제청구권···················································· 539 4. 임차인에 의한 수선·········································································· 540 5. 보증금(?敷金?) ····················································································· 541 C. 기타의 개정······························································································ 543 Ⅰ. 총 칙 편································································································· 543 1. 법률행위······························································································ 543 Ⅱ. 채권편 총칙··························································································· 553 1. 변5 제······························································································ 553 2. 상5 계······························································································ 560 3. 경 개······························································································ 564 Ⅲ. 채권편 각칙 계약·············································································· 566 1. 제3자를 위한 계약·········································································· 566 2. 증 여······························································································ 567 3. 소비대차······························································································ 567 4. 사용대차······························································································ 572 5. 위 임······························································································ 574 6. 임 치······························································································ 576 7. 조 합······························································································ 580 D. 소 결···································································································· 585 조문 색인········································································································ 589 재판례 색인··································································································· 595 사항?인명 색인··························································································· 600 |
양창수의 다른 상품
|
민법에 관한 논문·판례평석 등을 모은 『민법연구』 제9권을 발간한 것이 2007년11월이었다.
1991년에 『민법연구』 제1권, 제2권을 같이 낸 후로 그때까지는 2년 터울로 그 책을 한 권씩 내곤 했었다. 이번에는 10년이 훨씬 더 넘었다. 나는 2008년 9월부터 6년 간 대법관으로 일하였다. 학교로 돌아와 3년 반 후인 2018년 2월 말에 한양대학교에서 교수의 직을 정년퇴임하였다. 물론 이어서 위 대학교의 석좌교수, 또 서울대학교 명예교수로 위촉되기는 하였다. 그러나 아무래도 정년퇴임은 연구자로서의 삶에서 하나의 고비임에 틀림없는 것이다. 그리하여 이번에는 교수로서 쓴 글을 ‘정리’한다는 생각을 출발점으로 하여 한 권의 책을 엮었다. 물론 종전과 같이 논문이나 판례평석도 있다. 그러나 보다 자유롭게 강연을 위한 원고는 물론이고 오히려 연구메모라고 불러야 할 것이나 앞으로의 공부를 위하여 정리한 자료, 나아가 번역도 모아 보았다. 그리고 그것을 쓴 시기도 반드시 최근이 아닌 경우가 적지 않고 또 형식적으로 보아도 상당한 편차가 있다. 그렇게 보면 均齊美가 떨어진다고 할 수 있을 듯하다. 각 글의 말미에 [후기]를 보태서, 그 글이 발표된 후의 사정 등은 물론이고 애초 그것이 작성된 연유 같은 것을 정리하여 본 것도 시간의 틈을 메우고자 하는 생각이 없지 않았다. 그러나 이번에도 부당이득에 관하여 쓴 글들은 역시 넣지 않았다. 언젠가 그것들만을 따로 모아서 별개의 '틀?' 탐색하여 보고자 하는 생각이 없지 않은 까닭이다. |