|
PREFACE THE CENSORSHIP
A READABLE BLUEBOOK HOW NOT TO DO IT THE STORY OF THE JOINT SELECT COMMITTEE WHY THE MANAGERS LOVE THE CENSORSHIP A TWO GUINEA INSURANCE POLICY WHY THE GOVERNMENT INTERFERED THE PEERS ON THE JOINT SELECT COMMITTEE THE COMMITTEE’S ATTITUDE TOWARD THE THEATRE A BAD BEGINNING A COMIC INTERLUDE AN ANTI-SHAVIAN PANIC A RARE AND CURIOUS FIRST EDITION THE TIMES TO THE RESCUE THE COUNCIL OF TEN THE SENTENCE THE EXECUTION THE REJECTED STATEMENT PART I THE WITNESS’S QUALIFICATIONS THE DEFINITION OF IMMORALITY WHAT TOLERATION MEANS THE CASE FOR TOLERATION THE LIMITS TO TOLERATION THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN LAW AND CENSORSHIP WHY THE LORD CHAMBERLAIN? THE DIPLOMATIC OBJECTION TO THE LORD CHAMBERLAIN THE OBJECTION OF COURT ETIQUET WHY NOT AN ENLIGHTENED CENSORSHIP? THE WEAKNESS OF THE LORD CHAMBERLAIN’S DEPARTMENT AN ENLIGHTENED CENSORSHIP STILL WORSE THAN THE LORD CHAMBERLAIN’S THE PRACTICAL IMPOSSIBILITIES OF CENSORSHIP THE ARBITRATION PROPOSAL THE REJECTED STATEMENT: PART TWO THE LICENSING OF THEATRES THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN LICENSING AND CENSORSHIP PROSTITUTION AND DRINK IN THEATRES WHY THE MANAGERS DREAD LOCAL CONTROL DESIRABLE LIMITATIONS OF LOCAL CONTROL SUMMARY PREFACE RESUMED MR. GEORGE ALEXANDER’S PROTEST ELIZA AND HER BATH COUNSEL’S OPINION WANTED: A NEW MAGNA CHARTA PROPOSED: A NEW STAR CHAMBER POSSIBILITIES OF THE PROPOSAL STAR CHAMBER SENTIMENTALITY ANYTHING FOR A QUIET LIFE SHALL THE EXAMINER OF PLAYS STARVE? LORD GORELL’S AWAKENING JUDGES: THEIR PROFESSIONAL LIMITATIONS CONCLUSION AYOT ST. LAWRENCE, 14TH JULY 1910. THE SHEWING-UP OF BLANCO POSNET |